KHH Enviros Logo

KHH Enviros Logo
Showing posts with label Copenhagen. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Copenhagen. Show all posts

Friday, December 18, 2009

Summary of Canada's Position at UN talks in Copenhagen - Oh crap!

This comes from the Climate Action Network operating in Copenhagen, Denmark at the UN talks.
It's a summary of Canada's position at the UN talks in Copenhagen.
Read it and weap...




Canada is Getting Away with Something…

AT HOME…

Canada is one of the top 10 per capita and net emitters of GHGs… 
-­- Net emissions: 747 Mt in 2007 (8th overall) ­
- Per capita: 22-­-3 t per person in 2007 (9th overall)

Canada’s emissions reduction target is 3% below 1990 levels by 2020;
despite being announced 2 ½ years ago, there is still no domestic plan to meet this target.

Canada is the only G7 country with no national program to support renewable energy.

Canada is home to the world’s dirtiest industrial project: the Alberta and Saskatchewan Tar Sands whose
emissions have increased 200% since 1990 and are projected to account for 44% of the growth in
 
Canada’s emissions by 2020 if not regulated properly.

Canada is “failing to follow” the US -­--­--­- who is currently considering legislation that will exceed its target (with a far more ambitious 2050 target) and is investing 14 times more per capita in renewable energy.

IN THE NEGOTIATIONS… 

Canada is the only country that does not intend to meet its Kyoto Protocol emissions reduction target and is 34% above its 6% below 1990 levels by 2012 KP target.

Canada does not support a second commitment period for the Kyoto Protocol.

Canada is one of only two countries not supporting a standardized 1990 baseline year.

Canada is the only country who has called for major developing countries to take on absolute emissions reduction targets.

Canada has not yet committed any new finance in the short-­-term to support mitigation or adaptation in developing countries.

Canada supports a ‘forward looking baseline approach’ in LULUCF which would lead to emissions ‘loop holes’ and false phantom credits.’






This copy was downloaded off of Windfall Ecology Centre website.
If you would like the .pdf file download it here

Tuesday, December 15, 2009

Comparing Places - To move or not to move...



In the grand scheme of things, most people in this world don't move around very much, and certainly not over large distances in short periods of time as I have been doing in the past 2+ weeks. People stay in their homes, go to work, see their friends and arrive back in the same spot before they go to bed, then they wake up and do it all over again, and it's for one simple reason: they can't move, they're stuck in the life they have. 

It's an odd thing to consider sometimes, though most of us are stuck in one way or another by the circumstances of our lives. We know this because we're not living out our absolute, perfect, dream-like lifestyle. We have responsibilities, commitments, and social pressures pulling us back to "where we belong." These sorts of things are common the world over and they stop us from doing what we really want all the time.

At this moment I'm in Toronto, on my 9th city and 3rd continent in just 3 weeks, and I'm noticing some stark differences and glaring similarities between places and people.

The most interesting to me at the moment - perhaps also because this is an enviro blog - is the way in which people move around; be it from home to work and back again or over longer distances for other reasons.


I started in Taiwan where people are in love with their scooters, cars are a status symbol and the brand new MRT (Mass Rapid Transit) is desperate to be recognized as a legitimate form of transportation.








From Taiwan I flew (yes, I know, I hate flying, too) to Europe and stayed in Germany, Holland, Denmark and Britain where mass transit is relied upon for nearly every journey where possible and convenient, though cars still play a role. I found it telling that in Denmark bikes are still used a great deal even in winter, AND that the girl whose birthday we went out for in London made an "unusual request" that we take a taxi to the restaurant instead of the underground. Clearly, cars in Europe aren't quite what they are elsewhere.


And lastly, I've come home to Canada, where bikes are for pleasure, the mass transit is horribly underfunded and cars carry their single passenger over great distances every morning and evening for the commute. The alternatives to taking a car in Canada are groaningly moving forward at a snail's pace. The argument remains: "I need my car because everything is so far away." True, things are far, but do you really need a four-seater to go get groceries or commute 20 minutes to work everyday? Probably not, unless you're bringing 3 imaginary friends with you.

Now, I don't like to country bash, and pointing out the faults in my own country is easy when you live abroad and are happy about it, but I find it a little frustrating coming back to Canada. After having traveled so seamlessly through Europe on smooth-gliding high speed trains and well managed tram systems which run throughout the country - even in small cities like where I used to live in Germany - I'm ready to start criticizing a little bit.

There comes a time when we have to wake up as a country and realize that the world is passing us by, and all the while we're convinced of our own superiority. Asia is hard at work building their transit infrastructure and using Europe technology to do so. They're asking the experts and paying them well to make their societies more livable. We are not.



Good transit is also a poverty issue, and you can ask any economist; poverty is bad for business. If a person from Mississauga can get quickly and easily across the city without a car, then more job opportunities open up. In this way cities can reduce the poor's dependence on welfare and gain more tax-paying citizens.

At the moment we have the economic advantage, but that is largely dependent upon variables like infrastructure and - perhaps most importantly - attracting talent. What does it say about Canada when the most talented of my friends (and the least as well) aren't staying in Canada because they want to, but rather because they feel stuck in those responsibilities, which keep the rest of the world from moving around?

It won't stay like this forever. Those who stick with what they've always done will only get what they've always had. In a world that's progressing very quickly, we just can't afford to have such a crappy mass transit infrastructure. It's a detriment to our people and it's a large part of why I don't want to move back to Canada.


Environmentalism is no longer a movement of hippies and frustrated youth, it's a global movement that is touching every economic field with a large, firm index finger.

If we continue to ignore that, in transportation or any other sector, we will be left behind.

Tuesday, December 8, 2009

Klima Forum - Uprooting the Grass, uh, do I have that right?








Last night was the openeing ceremonies of Klima Forum 09 here in Copenhagen.
Uh, interesting, yes, to say the least.


Just imagine if you will, watching 5 bobbing heads all sitting behind a string, woodwind or horn instrument staring at two guys playing the...ahem...Ice.

Yup, that was their gig, they played ICE!
And not just any ice my friend, this was ice that was brought in directly from the Arctice Circle to be played before the uprooty, grassy crowd that came to see it.

The really funny thing was, IT SOUNDED PRETTY DARN GOOD; as far as ice music goes that is. Why I remember a good ice hammerin' session back in aught six. We was hangin' out in Bangkok and this fella comes in talkin' and refrigerameration or sumphin'. Before you need it we'd found two Bangkok prostitutes to play the banjo, three seamen playing SPOONS and this ice guy layin' it to them with a haunting air you wouldn't believe.

Uh, actually, that never happened, but it would've been funny if it did. Back to the Forum...

The highlight of the night for me was the African fellow who kept making us shout "Mobilize, resist and " the last one I think was "organize," that would've made sense, but anyway he had lots of energy and I loved his accent.

Shortly after him came Noami Klein, the Canadian author.

She almost shot herself in the foot by admitting that her climate expertise is slim to none, but it made little different after she got into her corporation bashing mode. She's intelligent and makes good sense, but geez, can't they just all get along?

My old mama used to tell me "you'll never get a dog to sit if you stand back and throw rocks at it, you gotta step up first and show it some love."

Seriously, though, Mrs. Klein's arguments were well formed and well presented. The part that truly impressed me was the "marketization of hope," comment directed mostly at Coca-Cola (with their Hopenhagen campaign), Siemens (and their Future City) and of course, President Obama who has done an excellent job of reaching out to the hope in people instead of the fear like his predecessor, Naomi said, but has "missed more great opportunities than any other President in history."

To that, I must agree, despite how much I love the guy. We all know that the President of the United States is no longer the most powerful man in the world, 'cause if he was, things would've changed a lot more during his year and a half in office, and Naomi Klein illustrated that very well.

By the end of the evening - which included more weird music - the tone of the Forum was clear: this is for everyone who is pissed off that their governments haven't done hardly anything the people are asking for. It's a chance to learn about why, but not yet clear if this forum will help us organize to fix it.

A forum is usually just a place to talk...
...we'll see...

--Tim
KHH Enviros Director
http://khhenviros.110mb.com
khhenviros@gmail.com